For your first paper, you will continue thinking and writing about Cultural Relativism. You will write a 1200-1500 word reaction paper.
You will be watching the movie HOTEL RWANDA and following the instructions below.
Make sure to CITE your sources. You CAN ONLY use class material to make your case.
HANDY-DANDY GUIDE TO WRITING A PAPER FOR ME:
1.Introduction/Thesis: State your Thesis and introduce your paper!
2.SUMMARY/SYNOPSIS– What are you reacting to? THIS SHOULD ONLY BE A SHORT SUMMARY AND SHOULD BE PREFACED WITH A MORE GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO YOUR MAIN THOUGHTS ABOUT THE MEETING POINT BETWEEN THE MOVIE AND THE THOUGHT PROMPTS BELOW. Should not be more than a few hundred words.
Goal: Present what you are writing about.
Identify all of the basic information: about the book/movie/documentary that you can and introduce your purpose/thesis, including:
3.Thought Prompts/Analysis/Personal Response—
You will be choosing a side: Pro Relativism or Pro Universalism (weak or strong).
Goal: You should be writing about your naive views as they relate to the possibility of a universal morality versus a relativistic model. You should use the movie as an entry point.
I have listed a few questions below that should help you think about the case you want to make and how to relate it back to the movie. You should be connecting our discussion about cultural relativism (esp, the cultural differences argument [ie, the argument for CR) and criticisms of CR) with the themes and ideas in the movie. The questions below are NOT the writing prompts for this assignment. They are meant to get you brainstorming.
+What goals does the United Nations pursue? When, if at all, is UN intervention or involvement morally permissible?
+Tatsi tells her husband (scene 17, roughly 1:20:24 into the film): “You are a good man, Paul Rusesabagina.” Does she mean he is a good Hutu? If not (or if not merely that), what does it mean to be a (morally) good person?
+How do you react to the piece on a (moral) personal level?
+How does the piece relate to your experience or your own “naive” moral perspective?
+what questions does the piece raise for you — about the material, about other things?
+does the piece remind you of other readings you’ve done for the class? compare and contrast the piece to those readings.